TechForge

August 11, 2025

Binance has teamed up with BBVA, one of Spain’s largest banks, to serve as an independent custodian for customer funds, according to the Financial Times, which cited two people familiar with the deal.

The arrangement is intended to rebuild trust in centralised cryptocurrency platforms after scandals like the FTX collapse and Binance’s own run-ins with regulators. Under the deal, Binance users can store assets with BBVA, backed by bank-held collateral. Similar agreements have been made with Switzerland’s Sygnum and FlowBank.

The FT reported that customer funds held with BBVA are kept in US Treasuries. Binance then uses these assets as margin for trading on its platform, which could lower counterparty risk.

Binance did not confirm the details when contacted by Cointelegraph, saying only that it had received the request for comment.

A step towards safer storage

Sources told the FT that Binance has only a small number of banking partners for independent custody, but BBVA’s well-known name may boost trust among users.

On Thursday, Binance also introduced a service that lets European users convert cryptocurrency to fiat and withdraw directly to Mastercard accounts, with near-instant availability. The feature is open to users in the European Economic Area and the UK, aiming to make cashing out simpler.

Before such banking partnerships, Binance customers relied entirely on the exchange to store their assets. Using established banks for custody adds an extra layer of protection – something with which the cryptocurrency sector has struggled since high-profile collapses.

When FTX failed in 2022, many customers were locked out of their accounts, facing major financial losses. The exchange held about US$175 million in investments from Genesis Trading alone, highlighting the risks of keeping all assets under a single entity’s control.

Lingering doubts over fund access

Concerns about frozen funds surfaced again after Indian exchange WazirX, once closely linked to Binance, halted withdrawals for its 16 million users following a major security breach.

WazirX sought Binance’s help to cover the losses, but Binance disputed the need, saying: “Their [WazirX’s] attempts to shift responsibility is a disappointing deflection tactic, but it should not distract anyone from the glaring issue to be addressed here: the need for the WazirX team to be held accountable for user funds lost under their management.”

(Image by Ramon Perucho)

See also: The GENIUS Act: Does America’s new stablecoin framework create more problems than it solves?

Want to learn more from industry leaders? Attend leading events including Digital Transformation Week, IoT Tech Expo, Edge Computing Expo, Intelligent Automation, AI & Big Data Expo, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.

Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars powered by TechForge here.

About the Author

Journalist

As a tech journalist, Zul focuses on topics including cloud computing, cybersecurity, and disruptive technology in the enterprise industry. He has expertise in moderating webinars and presenting content on video, in addition to having a background in networking technology.

Related

‘Bitcoin Jesus’ settles US tax case for $49.9 million

October 15, 2025

Crypto investors brace for more swings after $19 billion liquidation

October 14, 2025

Gorilla introduces quantum-safe SD-WAN for AI and national security

October 10, 2025

UK to lift ban on crypto ETNs, unlocking $1 trillion

October 8, 2025

Join our Community

Subscribe now to get all our premium content and latest tech news delivered straight to your inbox

Popular

When can we expect blockchain to change the ad tech industry?

28076 view(s)

Cambridge Analytica: Using blockchain to prevent data breaches

19741 view(s)

IOTA review: A cryptocurrency which could change the Internet of Things

17742 view(s)

Dallas Mavericks to allow Bitcoin payments, BitPay confirms

15021 view(s)

Subscribe

All our premium content and latest tech news delivered straight to your inbox

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.